Category Preservation and Proximity versus Phonetic Approximation in Loanword Adaptation

By Darlene LaCharit, Carole Paradis. Linguistic Inquiry, 2005

246 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The symbiosis between perception and grammar in loanword phonology (2006, background): “All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2005.05.007 The grammar proper has little or no access to perceptual information (Jacobs and Gussenhoven, 2000; Paradis, 1995; LaCharité and Paradis, 2005).”
Issues in loanword adaptation: A case study from Thai (2006, background): “Carole Paradis and her collaborators ( LaCharite and Paradis, 2005 and cited references) defend the view that loanword adaptation is largely performed by bilinguals who draw on their native-like competencies in both the donor and recipient languages to discern equivalences between phonological cate”
The influence of orthography on loanword adaptations (2006, background): “Orthography is rarely taken into account as a possible factor in loanword adaptations, and when it is, its influence is usually described as marginal at most (Lovins, 1975; Danesi, 1985; LaCharité and Paradis, 2000, 2005; Paradis and Prunet, 2000).”