2008 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy SybilLimit: A Near-Optimal Social Network Defense against Sybil Attacks
Citations in the corpus
Mitigating Sybils in Federated Learning Poisoning (2018, background): “Many sybil detection problems involve mapping the interactions between clients into a weighted graph and using sybil defenses from social networks [36] as a reduction.”
Proactively Accountable Anonymous Messaging in Verdict (2012, background): “Dynamic group management schemes could leverage existing Sybil prevention techniques [47, 53, 54], but we do not consider such approaches herein.”
The socialbot network: when bots socialize for fame and money (2011, methodology): “This, however, has alarming implications on software systems that use the social graph of an OSN to provide services such as limiting Sybil nodes in distributed systems [45] and modeling trust in sociallyinformed recommender systems [43].”
On the Embeddability of Random Walk Distances (2013, background): “are resistant to noise and manipulation, they are also widely used to build robust reputation systems [17] and Sybil detection systems on social networks [43, 44].”
Reliable Client Accounting for Hybrid Content-Distribution Networks (2012, background): “Defenses against Sybil attacks: Douceur’s original paper on the Sybil attack [17] suggests resource testing as a possible defense, and subsequent work has explored a variety of solutions for different types of resources, such as distinct physical locations [10], money [25], and social relationships ”
Uncovering social network sybils in the wild (2011, methodology): “Although multiple Sybil detection algorithms have been proposed, such as SybilGuard [Yu et al. 2006], SybilLimit [Yu et al. 2008], SybilInfer [Danezis and Mittal 2009], and SumUp [Tran et al. 2009], prior work demonstrates that these Sybil detectors generalize to community detection [Viswanath et al”