Process Capability Indices in Theory and Practice

By L. Zimmer. Technometrics, 2000

356 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/60ec2b7f7fb40411a708ec490194ea1fb8fde5cf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Control and Systems Engineering

1. Cheng Peng
2. Evdokia Xekalaki
3. Michael Perakis

In Statistics and Probability

1. Cheng Peng
2. Evdokia Xekalaki
3. Michael Perakis
4. Zhaohui Wang

Citations in the corpus

• Parametric Lower Confidence Limits of Quantile-Based Process Capability Indices (2010, methodology): “As pointed out by Kotz and Lovelace ([14], page 143), if we can find a better distribution for the data, we can obtain a more accurate estimate of the quantiles and use them in the definition of PCIs.”
• A process capability index that is based on the proportion of conformance (2002, background): “A comprehensive discussion of these four indices (and many other indices too) is provided by Kotz and Johnson (1993), Kotz and Lovelace (1998) and Kotz and Johnson (2002). A deficiency of the indices Cp, Cpk, Cpm and Cpmk is that their values can be assessed solely for processes for which both the l”