Crop rotation versus monoculture; yield, N yield and ear fraction of silage maize at different levels of mineral N fertilization
By F. Nevens, Dirk Reheul. 2001
49 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract Dry matter (DM) yields, N yields, ear fractions and economically optimum N fertilizer rates for silage maize were determined in monoculture and in rotational cropping on a sandy loam soil in Flanders. Rotationally cropped silage maize resulted in higher DM yields, higher N yields and higher ear fractions. These positive effects decreased with increasing mineral N fertilization. With both rotational cropping and monoculture, economically optimum maize yields were obtained with a lower N fertilizer input than was the case for the physically optimum yields, and the optimum N rate was likely to decrease further if the future N fertilizer use will be restricted by levies or higher fertilizer prices. The gradual increase in yield potential of silage maize resulting from plant breeding was expressed better and was exploited in a more efficient way when maize was grown in rotation than when grown in monoculture.
Subfields: Agronomy and Crop Science, Soil Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/60cc4af313f324859621413bcb7a67d3cbb97b9a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Agronomy and Crop Science
In Soil Science
Citations in the corpus
- Soil biological quality after 36 years of ley-arable cropping, permanent grassland and permanent arable cropping (2008, background): “The clay ( 2 mm), silt (2–20 mm), fine sand (20–200 mm) and coarse sand (200– 2000 mm) contents of the soil were 86 g kg 1, 116 g kg 1, 758 g kg 1 and 40 g kg 1, respectively (Nevens and Reheul, 2001).”
- Wheat improves nitrogen use efficiency of maize and soybean-based cropping systems (2015, background): “…shown to decrease rotational benefits of legumes on maize yields in various studies (Adams et al., 1970; Copeland and Crookston, 1992; Crookston et al., 1991; Nevens and Reheul, 2001; Peterson and Varvel, 1989; Porter et al., 1997; Riedell et al., 1998; Singer and Cox, 1998; Stecker et al., 1995).”