Experimental study of the influence of vision on sound localization.

By G. J. Thomas. 1941

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Assessing the Role of the ‘Unity Assumption’ on Multisensory Integration: A Review (2017, background): “…are considered as in some sense ‘going together,’ observers will be more likely to treat them as referring to a single multisensory object or event, as compared to the condition where such an assumption is lacking (e.g., Thomas, 1941; Jackson, 1953; Welch and Warren, 1980, for early examples).”
Crossmodal binding: Evaluating the “unity assumption” using audiovisual speech stimuli (2007, background): “... unimodal events—a decision that is made, at least in part, on the basis of the consistency of the information available to each sensory modality (Welch & Warren, 1980, p. 663; see also Laurienti, Kraft, Maldjian, Burdette, & Wallace, 2004), 1 and on the basis of perceptual grouping (Lyons, Sanab”
Facilitation of multisensory integration by the "unity effect" reveals that speech is special. (2008, methodology): “…sensory inputs into unified multisensory percepts has been demonstrated by research that has used both simple stimuli (Bertelson & de Gelder, 2004; Thomas, 1941; Witkin, Wapner, & Leventhal, 1952) as well as more complex stimuli, such as speech (Easton & Basala, 1982; Jackson, 1953; Walker,…”
Audiovisual multisensory integration (2007, background): “Radeau and Bertelson [6] were able to replicate the findings of Thomas’s [8] early study by showing that the”
Rules of intersensory integration in spatial scene analysis and speechreading (2001, background): “The ventriloquism effect is not suppressed but significantly reduced in non synchronous conditions (Radeau & Bertelson, 1977; 1987; Thomas, 1941), and so is it for the McGurk illusion (Bertelson, Vroomen & de Gelder, 1997; Munhall, Gribble, Sacco & Ward, 1996).”