REVERSAL OF FORTUNE: The Resurgence of Individual Risk Assessment in Criminal Justice

By J. Simon. 2005

69 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Cynthia Rudin
2. Berk Ustun
3. Jiaming Zeng
4. Kelly Hannah-Moffat
5. Momin M. Malik

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Cynthia Rudin
2. Berk Ustun
3. Jiaming Zeng
4. Kelly Hannah-Moffat
5. Momin M. Malik

Citations in the corpus

• Interpretable classification models for recidivism prediction (2015, background): “…use in different countries and areas of the criminal justice system, spurred on by continued research into the superiority of actuarial judgment (Dawes et al. 1989, Grove and Meehl 1996) as well as a desire to efficiently use limited public resources (Clements 1996, Simon 2005, McCord 1978, 2003).”
• Actuarial Sentencing: An “Unsettled” Proposition (2013, background): “…and astute conceptual arguments for strictly limiting the role of actuarial risk logics in sentencing decisions (especially general assessments) due to its conflict with existing principles29 and theories of “just” punishments (Hudson, 2003; Maurutto & Hannah-Moffat, 2007; Simon, 1988, 2005).”