Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine.

By L. Amiot, K. Lang, Michael Putzier, Hartmut Zippel, H. Labelle. Spine, 2000

456 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/60b139e7df3fd788a6689c060015dd71128f3419

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. I. Gelalis
2. N. Paschos
3. E. Pakos
4. A. Politis
5. C. Arnaoutoglou
6. A. Karageorgos
7. A. Ploumis
8. T. Xenakis

Citations in the corpus

• Free Hand Pedicle Screw Placement in the Thoracic Spine: Is it Safe? (2004, background): “0 mm, there were no permanent neurologic, cardiovascular, or pulmonary complications associated medial wall violation in any cases.(6,8,12,13,18,24,30,39) This current study showed 10 screws with medial cortical wall violation (between 2.”
• Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques (2012, background): “The literature does not lack of studies that evaluate the accuracy of pedicle screw placement with different guidance methods [2–6, 8, 10–12, 16].”