TOWARD A REALISTIC PULSAR MAGNETOSPHERE

By C. Kalapotharakos, Demosthenes Kazanas, A. Harding, I. Contopoulos. 2011

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present the magnetic and electric field structures and the currents and charge densities of pulsar magnetospheres that do not obey the ideal condition, E · B = 0. Since the acceleration of particles and the production of radiation require the presence of an electric field component parallel to the magnetic field, E∥, the structure of non-ideal pulsar magnetospheres is intimately related to the production of pulsar radiation. Therefore, knowledge of the structure of non-ideal pulsar magnetospheres is important because their comparison (including models for the production of radiation) with observations will delineate the physics and the parameters underlying the pulsar radiation problem. We implement a variety of prescriptions that support non-zero values for E∥ and explore their effects on the structure of the resulting magnetospheres. We produce families of solutions that span the entire range between the vacuum and the (ideal) force-free electrodynamic solutions. We also compute the amount of dissipation as a fraction of the Poynting flux for pulsars of different angles between the rotation and magnetic axes and conclude that this is at most 20%–40% (depending on the non-ideal prescription) in the aligned rotator and 10% in the perpendicular one. We present also the limiting solutions with the property J = ρc and discuss their possible implication on the determination of the “on/off” states of the intermittent pulsars. Finally, we find that solutions with values of J greater than those needed to null E∥ locally produce oscillations, potentially observable in the data.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Ocean Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/60ac078df7f6e48f6004e82da096a483ef8f9b80

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Michael Kramer
  2. A. Spitkovsky
  3. A. Philippov
  4. A. Strong
  5. E. Orlando
  6. B. Cerutti
  7. R. Manchester
  8. Simon Johnston

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. Michael Kramer
  2. R. Manchester
  3. A. Philippov
  4. B. Cerutti
  5. R. Shannon
  6. F. Camilo
  7. Andrew G. Lyne
  8. Simon Johnston

In Ocean Engineering

  1. A. Spitkovsky
  2. A. Tchekhovskoy

Citations in the corpus