Understanding the Spreading Patterns of Mobile Phone Viruses
By Pu Wang, Marta C. González, César A. Hidalgo, Albert-László Barabási. Science, 2009
451 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Viruses and Mobile Phones While traditional cellphones have been relatively immune to viruses, smartphones (like Palm, Blackberry, iPhone, and many Nokia brands) that can share programs and data with each other could potentially be vulnerable to virus epidemics. Why then haven't we experienced any major mobile virus outbreak so far? Wang et al. (p. 1071; published online 2 April; see the Perspective by Havlin) believe that the answer is related to the spreading patterns possible in the current mobile phone systems. They studied the anonymized billing record of a mobile phone company, representing the calling patterns and the coordinates of the closest mobile phone tower each time a group of 6.2 million mobile phone subscribers used their phone. While a Bluetooth virus could reach all susceptible users given sufficient time, its spread, limited by human mobility, was relatively slow. In contrast, MMS viruses would have an explosive spreading pattern, but could only reach the group of individuals that know each other and carry the same phone. Thus, no major virus outbreak is likely until one operating system encompasses a larger fraction of the total smartphone market. Current mobile phone usage prevents major mobile virus outbreaks, but conditions could arise leading to a phone epidemic. We modeled the mobility of mobile phone users in order to study the fundamental spreading patterns that characterize a mobile virus outbreak. We find that although Bluetooth viruses can reach all susceptible handsets with time, they spread slowly because of human mobility, offering ample opportunities to deploy antiviral software. In contrast, viruses using multimedia messaging services could infect all users in hours, but currently a phase transition on the underlying call graph limits them to only a small fraction of the susceptible users. These results explain the lack of a major mobile virus breakout so far and predict that once a mobile operating system’s market share reaches the phase transition point, viruses will pose a serious threat to mobile communications.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Transportation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/608f1bcd612239d01af7e38a60cec35e70a4a80f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Marc Barthelemy
- Albert-László Barabási
- Steven H. Strogatz
- Ying-Cheng Lai
- David Newth
- Wenxu Wang
- Joseph Ferreira Jr.
- Jukka-Pekka Onnela
In Information Systems
- Marc Barthelemy
- Fosca Giannotti
- Joseph Ferreira Jr.
- Ying-Cheng Lai
- Dino Pedreschi
- Fabio Pinelli
- Mirco Nanni
- Raja Jurdak
In Transportation
- Marc Barthelemy
- Carlo Ratti
- Francesco Calabrese
- Stanislav Sobolevsky
- Joseph Ferreira Jr.
- Nicholas A. Christakis
- Filippo Simini
- Albert-László Barabási
Citations in the corpus
- Data Based Identification and Prediction of Nonlinear and Complex Dynamical Systems (2016, background): “Dynamical processes taking place in complex networks are ubiquitous in nature and in engineering systems, examples of which include disease or epidemic spreading in the human society [410, 411], virus invasion in computer networks [268, 412], and rumor propagation in online social networks [413].”
- Redrawing the Map of Great Britain from a Network of Human Interactions (2010, background): “One could even imagine applying a similar analysis to the movement patterns of each individual, and determine boundaries that would minimize their disturbance [34–36].”
- Understanding Human Mobility from Twitter (2014, background): “Understanding individual human mobility is of fundamental importance for many applications from urban planning [21] to human and electronic virus prediction [17, 18] and traffic and population forecasting [20, 19].”
- Understanding individual mobility patterns from urban sensing data: A mobile phone trace example (2013, background): “…of pervasive systems like cellular networks, GPS devices, and WiFi hotspots that allow us to capture massive 2 https://www.iea.org/impagr/cip/archived_bulletins/issue_no23.htm amounts of real-time data related to people and cities (Reades et al. 2007, Gonzalez et al. 2008, Wang et al. 2009).”
- Measuring Large-Scale Social Networks with High Resolution (2014, background): “The ability to efficiently map communication networks and mobility patterns (using cell towers) for large populations has made it possible to quantify human mobility patterns, including investigations of social structure evolution [166], economic development [67], human mobility [37,38], spreading p”
- Spatial Networks (2010, methodology): “The authors of [308] used a database of a mobile phone provider and simulated the spread of disease using a SI type compartment model and studied the effect of various values of m.”
- Unveiling the complexity of human mobility by querying and mining massive trajectory data (2011, background): “Applications of these findings concern the spreading patterns of phone viruses [45] and the analysis of the entropy and predictability of human mobility [37].”
- Geographic Constraints on Social Network Groups (2010, background): “[22], who find that the nature of the spreading process, and its dependence on proximity, clearly affect the dynamics of the spreading.”
- Returners and explorers dichotomy in human mobility (2015, background): “The geographical spreading of an epidemic is a direct consequence of individuals’ movements 9,12,38,39 .”