Environmental efficiency in carbon dioxide emissions in the OECD: A non-parametric approach

By Osman Zaim, F. Taşkın. 2000

198 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/60844aa0f0fef454b0026935cf5254ec0e9ec2c4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. F. Shadman
2. Ali Emrouznejad
3. Susila Munisamy
4. W. Lise
5. Behrouz Arabi
6. Richard S. J. Tol
7. W. Moore

In Environmental Engineering

1. F. Shadman
2. Ali Emrouznejad
3. Susila Munisamy
4. W. Lise
5. Behrouz Arabi

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. F. Shadman
2. Ali Emrouznejad
3. Susila Munisamy
4. W. Lise
5. Behrouz Arabi

Citations in the corpus

• Decomposition of CO2 emissions over 1980-2003 in Turkey (2006, background): “…an EKC for Turkey, as the estimate of the quadratic term is not significant (error term in the brackets 4 A more advanced way to do the EKC test is to verify whether the variables GDP and E are integrated (Stern, 2004) or to consider efficient frontier models (Zaim and Taskin 2000a,b; Zaim 2004).”
• Environmental efficiency evaluation of industry in China based on a new fixed sum undesirable output data envelopment analysis (2014, unknown): “Several important DEA works on environmental efficiency or ecological efficiency have been carried out (Zaim and Taskin, 2000; Hua et al., 2007; Sarkis and Cordeiro, 2012; Nouri et al., 2013).”