On the dynamic adaptation of stochastic language models
By Reinhard Kneser, Volker Steinbiss. 1993
Subfields: Natural Language Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Natural Language Processing
- Graham Neubig
- Jason Aaron Edward Weston
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
- Edouard Grave
- Kyunghyun Cho
- Marc'Aurelio Ranzato
- Armand Joulin
- Chris Dyer
Citations in the corpus
- Unbounded cache model for online language modeling with open vocabulary (2017, methodology): “Other adaptive language models have been proposed in the past: Kneser and Steinbiss [35] and, Iyer and Ostendorf [26] dynamically adapt the parameters of their model to recent history using different weight interpolation schemes.”
- Improving Neural Language Models with a Continuous Cache (2016, background): “This makes this model particularly interesting for domain adaptation (Kneser & Steinbiss, 1993).”
- Continual Adaptation for Efficient Machine Communication (2019, background): “With this said, the extent of adaptation in humancomputer dialogue is known to be affected by human participants’ expectations about the artificial agent (Branigan et al., 2011; Koulouri et al., 2016), potentially including expectations about whether it will be adaptive or not.”
- Segmenting DNA sequence into 'words' based on statistical language model (2012, background): “More research works about the adaptation of n-gram models could refer to (22,23).”
- Contextual Language Model Adaptation for Conversational Agents (2018, unknown): “Hence, they do not model longer-range dependencies that may vary between different subsets of the training data such as speaking style, vocabulary and topics of conversation [1].”
- Two decades of statistical language modeling: where do we go from here? (2000, unknown): “[64] introduced yet another adapta tion scheme.”
- Statistical language model adaptation: review and perspectives (2004, background): “The others are smaller models trained on the relevant portions of B (Kneser and Steinbiss, 1993).”
- Generalizing and Hybridizing Count-based and Neural Language Models (2016, background): “Also conceptually similar is work on adaptation of n-gram LMs, which start with n-gram probabilities (Della Pietra et al., 1992; Kneser and Steinbiss, 1993; Rosenfeld, 1996; Iyer and Ostendorf, 1999) and adapt them based on the distribution of the current document, albeit in a linear model.”
- Lightweight Adaptive Mixture of Neural and N-gram Language Models (2018, methodology): “In (Kneser and Steinbiss, 1993) information about ground truth performance of several n-gram models on previous 400 words is used to predict the optimal interpolation weights at each position.”