The Oxford handbook of close relationships

419 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Relational mobility and close relationships: A socioecological approach to explain cross‐cultural differences (2017, background): “…refer to the types of relationships, such as friendships and romantic relationships, where individuals typically tend to feel greater closeness toward a partner than in other types of relationships, such as business Aron & Aron, 1986; Reis & Shaver, 1988; Rusbult, 1980; Simpson & Campbell, 2013).”
Love in the Time of COVID: Perceived Partner Responsiveness Buffers People From Lower Relationship Quality Associated With COVID-Related Stressors (2020, background): “…whether perceived partner responsiveness—the extent to which people believe that their partners understand, validate, and care for them (Reis, 2012; Reis & Clark, 2013; Reis et al., 2004)—can buffer against the lower relationship quality and greater conflict expected to be associated with greater…”
Perceived Partner Responsiveness Predicts Better Sleep Quality Through Lower Anxiety (2017, background): “…partners (National Sleep Foundation, 2013) and romantic relationships have a unique capacity to influence the quality of human health and well-being (Loving & Slatcher, 2013), the role of marital and cohabiting relationships in sleep quality has received increased research attention (Troxel, 2010).”