Tsunami Generation by Submarine Mass Failure. I: Modeling, Experimental Validation, and Sensitivity Analyses

By Stephan T. Grilli, P. Watts. 2005

289 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Numerical simulations are performed with a two-dimensional (2D) fully nonlinear potential flow (FNPF) model for tsunami generation by two idealized types of submarine mass failure (SMF): underwater slides and slumps. These simulations feature rigid or deforming SMFs with a Gaussian cross section, translating down a plane slope. In each case, the SMF center of mass motion is expressed as a function of geometric, hydrodynamic, and material parameters, following a simple wavemaker formalism, and prescribed as a boundary condition in the FNPF model. Tsunami amplitudes and runup are obtained from computed free surface elevations. Model results are experimentally validated for a rigid 2D slide. Sensitivity studies are performed to estimate the effects of SMF-shape, type, and initial submergence depth—on the generated tsunamis. A strong SMF deformation during motion is shown to significantly enhance tsunami generation, particularly in the far-field. Typical slumps are shown to generate smaller tsunamis than corresponding slides. Both tsunami amplitude and runup are shown to depend strongly on initial SMF submergence depth. For the selected SMF idealized geometry, this dependence is simply expressed by power laws. Other sensitivity analyses are presented in a companion paper, and results from numerical simulations are converted into empirical curve fits predicting characteristic tsunami amplitudes as functions of nondimensional governing parameters. It should be stressed that these empirical formulas are only valid in the vicinity of the tsunami sources and, because of the complexity of the problem, many simplifications were necessary. It is further shown in the companion paper how 2D results can be modified to account for three-dimensional tsunami generation and used for quickly estimating tsunami hazard or for performing simple case studies.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Earth-Surface Processes, Geophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/605a59d14936cd00b48a4da05dbeff8f36a0e392

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

  1. Fengyan Shi
  2. James T. Kirby
  3. Gangfeng Ma
  4. F. Mohammed
  5. Hermann Fritz
  6. Jeffrey C. Harris
  7. Stephan T. Grilli
  8. S. Abadie

In Earth-Surface Processes

  1. Fengyan Shi
  2. Jeffrey C. Harris
  3. James T. Kirby
  4. Stephan T. Grilli
  5. Gangfeng Ma
  6. Finn Løvholt
  7. Geir Pedersen
  8. R. Fabre

In Geophysics

  1. Fengyan Shi
  2. James T. Kirby
  3. Jeffrey C. Harris
  4. Gangfeng Ma
  5. Stephan T. Grilli
  6. F. Mohammed
  7. Hermann Fritz
  8. S. Abadie

Citations in the corpus