Response of decomposing litter and its microbial community to multiple forms of nitrogen enrichment

By S. Hobbie, W. C. Eddy, C. Buyarski, E. Adair, Mary E. Ogdahl, Pamela Weisenhorn. 2012

292 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/604699a0e51532b871d116d42730c03bbde5c041

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. J. Bouillet
2. J. Gonçalves
3. Yann Nouvellon
4. Richard P Phillips
5. E. Brzostek
6. J. Laclau

In Environmental Chemistry

1. Richard P Phillips
2. M. Midgley
3. E. Brzostek

In Soil Science

1. E. Brzostek
2. Richard P Phillips
3. J. Bouillet
4. J. Gonçalves
5. Yann Nouvellon
6. M. Midgley
7. J. Laclau
8. D. Forrester

Citations in the corpus

• Decay rates of leaf litters from arbuscular mycorrhizal trees are more sensitive to soil effects than litters from ectomycorrhizal trees (2015, background): “Furthermore, in a follow-up study, Hobbie et al. (2012) found that while inorganic N increased decomposition rates, it did not alter microbial community composition.”
• Decomposition of Eucalyptus grandis and Acacia mangium leaves and fine roots in tropical conditions did not meet the Home Field Advantage hypothesis (2016, background): “:P ratios) observed across various types of ecosystem (Silver and Miya, 2001; Hessen et al., 2004; Cornwell et al., 2008), at least in the early stages of decomposition (Hobbie et al., 2012).”