Galaxy Clustering in Early Sloan Digital Sky Survey Redshift Data

By Idit Zehavi, M. Blanton, Joshua A. Frieman, D. Weinberg, H. Mo, M. Strauss, S. Anderson, James Annis, N. Bahcall, Mariangela Bernardi and 59 more. 2002

501 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/603de3e4fdde99d92267890272176e0a346c15eb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

Citations in the corpus

Spectroscopic Target Selection in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: The Main Galaxy Sample (2002, methodology): “Figure 9 shows the measured redshift difference between such pairs (Zehavi et al. 2002); 58% of close pairs have a redshift difference less than 500 km s 1 (compared with only 4% of pairs of arbitrary angular separation).”
Ongoing assembly of massive galaxies by major merging in large groups and clusters from the SDSS (2007, background): “2) and the stronger clustering of red galaxies (e.g., Zehavi et al.2002), it is not surprising that the color difference ∆(g − r)12 = (g − r)1 − (g − r)2 distributions are narrow and peaked near zero.”
The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: correlation functions, peculiar velocities and the matter density of the Universe (2002, methodology): “Zehavi et al. (2002) used the SDSS data and found that a decreased with scale for σ 5 h−1 Mpc.”
Statistical analysis of galaxy surveys – I. Robust error estimation for two-point clustering statistics (2008, methodology): “Zehavi et al. (2002) carried out a simple test of the accuracy of the jackknife estimate of the variance and found that the jackknife produced an essentially unbiased estimate, but with a scatter that could approach 50 per cent.”
Analysis of Systematic Effects and Statistical Uncertainties in Angular Clustering of Galaxies from Early Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data (2001, methodology): “Additional tests of the jackknife and subsample methods in comparison to simulated data sets can be found in Zehavi et al. (2002).”
The 6dF Galaxy Survey: Samples, observational techniques and the first data release (2004, unknown): “…2004 RAS Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-abstract/355/3/747/952751 by guest on 30 July 2018 mass density (Peacock et al. 2001; Percival et al. 2001; Efstathiou et al. 2002; Lahav et al. 2002; Verde et al. 2002; Zehavi et al. 2002; Hawkins et al. 2003; Szalay et al. 2003).”
Structure formation in inhomogeneous dark energy models (2004, background): “1 I N T RO D U C T I O N Measurements of the luminosity–redshift relationship from observations of Type Ia supernovae (SNeIa) (Perlmutter et al. 1999; Riess et al. 2001; Knop et al. 2003), the matter power spectrum of large-scale structure as inferred from galaxy redshift surveys, like the Sloan Dig”
NEW CONSTRAINTS ON THE EVOLUTION OF THE STELLAR-TO-DARK MATTER CONNECTION: A COMBINED ANALYSIS OF GALAXY–GALAXY LENSING, CLUSTERING, AND STELLAR MASS FUNCTIONS FROM z = 0.2 to z = 1 (2011, background): “…in luminosity or stellar mass (e.g., Seljak 2000; Peacock & Smith 2000; Scoccimarro et al. 2001; Berlind & Weinberg 2002; Bullock et al. 2002; Zehavi et al. 2002, 2005, 2011b; Zheng et al. 2005, 2007; Tinker et al. 2007; Skibba & Sheth 2009; Brown et al. 2008; Wake et al. 2011; Foucaud et…”
Λ Cold Dark Matter, Stellar Feedback, and the Galactic Halo Abundance Pattern (2005, background): “…from high-precision, large-scale cosmological observations (e.g. Spergel et al. 2003; Blakeslee et al. 2003; Pen et al. 2003; Lahav et al. 2002; Zehavi et al. 2002), a variety of data on galactic and subgalactic scales has remained more difficult to explain (e.g. Simon et al. 2005; Moore et…”
The dependence of clustering on galaxy properties (2005, methodology): “Zehavi et al. (2002) have performed extensive tests of this procedure and have shown that it works well for rp > 0.1h −1Mpc. Tegmark et al. (2004) also find no evidence that fibre collisions are boosting their measured power spectrum on the smallest scales they probe (k ∼ 0.3 h Mpc−1 ).”
The 2dF-SDSS LRG and QSO Survey: the LRG 2-point correlation function and redshift-space distortions (2006, methodology): “Journal compilation C© 2007 RAS, MNRAS 381, 573–588 at O xford Journals on Septem ber 19, 2013 http://m nras.oxfordjournals.org/ D ow nloaded from where ξ̄ is the mean value of ξ measured from all the jackknife subsamples and N = 32 in our case (cf. Zehavi et al. 2002).”
The Dark Side of the Halo Occupation Distribution (2003, methodology): “For example, it would be interesting to compare the HOD of galaxies of different colors (e.g., Zehavi et al. 2002) with that of halos with different merger histories or environments, which would likely provide insight into the formation of galaxies of different types.”
The Halo Occupation Distribution and the Physics of Galaxy Formation (2002, methodology): “…measurements of the galaxy correlation function have appeared consistent with a power law on scales rd5 h 1 Mpc (e.g., Norberg et al. 2002a; Zehavi et al. 2002; and numerous references therein), though there have been suggestions of a ‘‘ shoulder ’’ or flattening in the range 5 h 1…”
Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7 Galaxy Sample (2009, unknown): “Zehavi et al. (2002) corrected for this undersampling by assigning the redshift of the nearest observed galaxy to a galaxy which was not observed due to crowding, and showed that this provides sufficient correction for large-scale structure studies.”