The aliens have landed! What are the justifications for ‘native only’ policies in landscape plantings?

By A. D. Kendle, J. Rose. 2000

166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/60217b6145ea7afc04f963586e380eebf8f841d9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Marc W. Cadotte
2. Stuart W. Livingstone
3. S. E. Yasui
4. James Scott Macivor
5. H. Siipi
6. Petr Pyšek

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Marc W. Cadotte
2. James Scott Macivor
3. H. Siipi

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Marc W. Cadotte
2. Stuart W. Livingstone
3. S. E. Yasui
4. James Scott Macivor
5. H. Siipi
6. Aaron M. Ellison
7. R. P. Anderson
8. Jorge Soberón

Citations in the corpus

• Are urban systems beneficial, detrimental, or indifferent for biological invasion? (2017, background): “Even though NIS may be favoured in urban areas, they may replace native functions (Kendle and Rose 2000), for example, NIS trees and shrubs supporting native bird populations (Gray and van Heezik 2015).”
• Dimensions of Naturalness (2008, background): “…on Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:16:11 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms Many philosophers have connected the property based unnaturalness of human actions and activities to technology use (Rolston 1979, 12; Katz 1997a, 110-11; Katz 1997c, 122; Kendle & Rose 2000, 21; Lee 2003a, 56).”