Mechanisms of evoked and induced responses in MEG/EEG
By Olivier David, James M. Kilner, Karl J. Friston. NeuroImage, 2006
347 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6013ad5d132613ce4dd1f15bd3c2413017edb283
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Karl J. Friston
- Jean Daunizeau
- Stefan J. Kiebel
- Viktor Jirsa
- Olaf Sporns
- Anthony Randal McIntosh
- Michael Breakspear
- Paula Sanz-Leon
In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
- Jean Daunizeau
- Stefan J. Kiebel
- Viktor Jirsa
- André C. Marreiros
- Karl J. Friston
- Paula Sanz-Leon
- Stuart Knock
- Anthony Randal McIntosh
Citations in the corpus
- Population dynamics: Variance and the sigmoid activation function (2008, methodology): “There has been considerable success in modelling fMRI, EEG, MEG and LFP data using DCM (David et al., 2006a,b; Kiebel et al., 2006; Garrido et al., 2007; Moran et al., 2007).”
- The Virtual Brain: a simulator of primate brain network dynamics (2013, methodology): “…Parametric Mapping (SPM) perform statistical fitting to experimental data at the level of a small set of nodes (Friston et al., 1995, 2003; David et al., 2006; Pinotsis and Friston, 2011) [i.e., they are data-driven as in Freestone et al. (2011)], thus diverging from our approach that…”
- Developmental differences in threat learning are associated with changes in frontal-central theta activity (2025, unknown): “These spectral patterns may reflect complementary aspects of the EEG signal, occurring simultaneously and interacting with each other [39, 40 ].”
- The Role of Fronto‐Central Theta Oscillations in Inter‐Sensory Selective Attention (2025, unknown): “These non- phase-locked rhythms are thought to be implicated in top-down mechanisms (David et al. 2006; Deiber et al. 2007; Donner and Siegel 2011; Karakaş 2020) and there is recent evidence to suggest a distinct role of non- phase-locked activity in cognitive control (McKewen et al. 2020).”
- Neural signatures of syntactic variation in speech planning (2021, background): “ERD and ERS are currently among the most suitable means to study the neural processes underlying early stages of sentence planning because oscillatory power can capture both evoked (phase-locked) and induced (not phase-locked) responses [43,44].”