Precessing warped accretion discs in X‐ray binaries

By Gordon I. Ogilvie, Guillaume Dubus. 2000

190 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We study the radiation-driven warping of accretion discs in the context of X-ray binaries. The latest evolutionary equations are adopted, which extend the classical alpha theory to time-dependent thin discs with non-linear warps. We also develop accurate, analytical expressions for the tidal torque and the radiation torque, including self-shadowing. We investigate the possible non-linear dynamics of the system within the framework of bifurcation theory. First, we re-examine the stability of an initially flat disc to the Pringle instability. Then we compute directly the branches of non-linear solutions representing steadily precessing discs. Finally, we determine the stability of the non-linear solutions. Each problem involves only ordinary differential equations, allowing a rapid, accurate and well-resolved solution. We find that radiation-driven warping is probably not a common occurrence in low-mass X-ray binaries. We also find that stable, steadily precessing discs exist for a narrow range of parameters close to the stability limit. This could explain why so few systems show clear, repeatable ‘superorbital’ variations. The best examples of such systems, Her X-1, SS 433 and LMC X-4, all lie close to the stability limit for a reasonable choice of parameters. Systems far from the stability limit, including Cyg X-2, Cen X-3 and SMC X-1, probably experience quasi-periodic or chaotic variability as first noticed recently by Wijers and Pringle. We show that radiation-driven warping provides a coherent and persuasive framework but that it does not provide a generic explanation for the long-term variabilities in all X-ray binaries.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/600c6c130b8de4a911f2fe6266f1d827f186832d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. G. Lodato
  2. T. Rogers
  3. H. Lau
  4. Jim N. McElwaine
  5. J. Gladstone
  6. Bing Zhang
  7. U. Exeter
  8. Joshua S. Bloom

In Instrumentation

  1. U. Exeter
  2. Joshua S. Bloom
  3. A. King
  4. J. E. Pringle
  5. H. Lau
  6. D. Lin
  7. M. Begelman
  8. C. Heinke

Citations in the corpus