Learning From Noisy Labels With Deep Neural Networks: A Survey

By Hwanjun Song, Minseok Kim, Dongmin Park, Yooju Shin, Jae-Gil Lee. 2020

1,409 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Deep learning has achieved remarkable success in numerous domains with help from large amounts of big data. However, the quality of data labels is a concern because of the lack of high-quality labels in many real-world scenarios. As noisy labels severely degrade the generalization performance of deep neural networks, learning from noisy labels (robust training) is becoming an important task in modern deep learning applications. In this survey, we first describe the problem of learning with label noise from a supervised learning perspective. Next, we provide a comprehensive review of 62 state-of-the-art robust training methods, all of which are categorized into five groups according to their methodological difference, followed by a systematic comparison of six properties used to evaluate their superiority. Subsequently, we perform an in-depth analysis of noise rate estimation and summarize the typically used evaluation methodology, including public noisy datasets and evaluation metrics. Finally, we present several promising research directions that can serve as a guideline for future studies.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Evaluation & Benchmarks

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Jason Aaron Edward Weston
  2. Kurt Shuster
  3. Y-Lan Boureau
  4. Eric Michael Smith
  5. Arthur Szlam
  6. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  7. Mohit Bansal
  8. Jianfeng Gao

In Natural Language Processing

  1. Jason Aaron Edward Weston
  2. Kurt Shuster
  3. Y-Lan Boureau
  4. Eric Michael Smith
  5. Arthur Szlam
  6. Emily Dinan
  7. Jing Xu
  8. Stephen Roller

In Evaluation & Benchmarks

  1. Y-Lan Boureau
  2. Kurt Shuster
  3. Jason Aaron Edward Weston
  4. Eric Michael Smith
  5. Da Ju
  6. Jing Xu
  7. Arthur Szlam
  8. Stephen Roller

Citations in the corpus