Ex Ante Evaluation of Social Programs

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Equity, efficiency and inequality traps: A research agenda (2007, background): “Models for ex-ante policy evaluation, that simulate counterfactual income distributions for different groups, such as those recently proposed by Attanasio et al. [9], Bourguignon et al. [24], and Todd and Wolpin [61], are illustrative of this approach.”
Estimating the Benefits of Targeted R&D Subsidies (2013, methodology): “4 Since we observe firms’ R&D plans, not their actual R&D investments, our data are different from those used in most ex ante and ex post evaluation studies (Heckman & Vytlacil 2006a; Todd & Wolpin, 2008).”
The Structural Estimation of Behavioral Models: Discrete Choice Dynamic Programming Methods and Applications (2011, background): “Keane and Wolpin (2010) deal with these problems as follows.”
Minimizing Sensitivity to Model Misspecification (2018, background): “As emphasized by Todd and Wolpin (2008) and Attanasio et al. (2012), the ability to predict the effects of the program based solely on control villages imposes restrictions on the economic model.”