Selection of materials with potential in sensible thermal energy storage

By A. I. Fernández, Mónica Martínez, M. Segarra, I. Martorell, L. F. Cabeza. 2010

316 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Critical review of latent heat storage systems for free cooling in buildings (2018, unknown): “TCES systems have the advantage of high energy density at a constant temperature, long-term and stable storage, wide temperature ranges, and easy transportation [27, 28].”
Thermal energy storage: “How previous findings determine current research priorities” (2012, background): “Sensible heat storage materials undergo no phase change within the temperature range required for the storage application [19].”
Phase change materials and thermal energy storage for buildings (2015, background): “Thereby, waste materials from several industrial processes with proper thermophysical properties are becoming suitable candidates to be used for sensible heat TES [15,16].”
Latent heat storage with tubular-encapsulated phase change materials (PCMs) (2014, background): “Solid and liquid Sensible heat storage materials undergo no phase change within the temperature range [18,19].”
Advances in the valorization of waste and by-product materials as thermal energy storage (TES) materials (2016, background): “Furthermore, about long term cyclic stability, bischofite showed a very good behaviour related to melting point and heat of fusion (see Table 5), but it’s variable in the cooling process: the temperature of crystallization don’t remain constant during the cycles, this is a normal behaviour in hydrat”