Emotion-based Dispositions to Rash Action: Positive and Negative Urgency

By Melissa A. Cyders, Gregory T. Smith. Psychological bulletin, 2008

1,087 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Under heightened emotional states, individuals are more inclined to engage in ill-considered or rash actions than at other times. The authors present evidence for the existence of two related traits called positive and negative urgency. The traits refer to individual differences in the disposition to engage in rash action when experiencing extreme positive and negative affect, respectively. The authors provide evidence that these traits are distinct from other dispositions toward rash action, and that they play distinct roles in predicting problem levels of involvement in behaviors such as alcohol consumption, binge eating, drug use, and risky sexual behavior. The authors identify facilitative conditions for the emergence of the urgency traits from neuroscience. Certain gene polymorphisms are associated with low levels of serotonin and high levels of dopamine; that pattern of neurotransmitter activity in a brain system linking the orbitofrontal cortex and the amygdala appears to facilitate development of positive and negative urgency. The authors discuss the implications of this theory.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5fe36a3d2b5e8dd971143fa93cb7f77fe0fb4980

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

  1. F. Aysan
  2. M. Savci
  3. C. Nathan DeWall
  4. Mark D. Griffiths
  5. Gregory T. Smith
  6. R. Hunsaker
  7. Christopher G. Beevers
  8. J. Simons

In Clinical Psychology

  1. F. Aysan
  2. M. Savci
  3. Şerife İnci Şalvarlı
  4. C. Garofalo
  5. P. Velotti
  6. Mark D. Griffiths
  7. C. Nathan DeWall
  8. Gregory T. Smith

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

  1. Mark D. Griffiths
  2. Şerife İnci Şalvarlı
  3. C. Nathan DeWall
  4. F. Aysan
  5. Gregory T. Smith
  6. Christopher G. Beevers
  7. G. Zavattini
  8. C. Garofalo

Citations in the corpus