Transitivity, flexibility, conjunctive representations, and the hippocampus. II. A computational analysis

By Michael J Frank, J. Rudy, Randall C. O’Reilly. 2003

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

1. Alison R. Preston
2. Randall C. O’Reilly
3. Michael E. Hasselmo
4. Michael J Frank
5. Dagmar Zeithamova
6. J. Rudy
7. Marc W Howard
8. Margaret L. Schlichting

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Randall C. O’Reilly
2. Alison R. Preston
3. Michael J Frank
4. Michael E. Hasselmo
5. Dagmar Zeithamova
6. Jennifer D. Ryan
7. Sandra N. Moses
8. C. Villate

In Neurology

1. Randall C. O’Reilly
2. Michael J Frank
3. Alison R. Preston
4. Jennifer D. Ryan
5. Sandra N. Moses
6. C. Villate
7. William B. Levy
8. J. Rudy

Citations in the corpus

• An investigation of learning strategy supporting transitive inference performance in humans compared to other species. (2006, background): “F pairs due to the zero associative value of the perpetually n-rewarded stimulus F (Frank et al., 2003; Van Elzakker et al., 003; Wynne, 1995; Wynne et al., 1992).”
• The hippocampus and inferential reasoning: building memories to navigate future decisions (2012, background): “Notably, this alternative account also argues against a retrieval-based mechanism for inference (von Fersen et al., 1991; Frank et al., 2003).”
• Hippocampal activation during transitive inference in humans (2004, background): “…inference testing in animals can be explained by the value transfer theory, which predicts that the ability of a stimulus to attract a response is determined by positive/negative values acquired during reinforcement training (Frank et al., 2003; Van Elzakker et al., 2003; von Fersen et al., 1991).”
• Entorhinal Cortex Lesions Disrupt the Relational Organization of Memory in Monkeys (2004, methodology): “Although multiple strategies can support inferential responding (Frank et al., 2003; Van Elzakker et al., 2003), our prediction based on previous findings (McGonigle and Chalmers, 1992; Rapp et al., 1996) was that the flexible manipulation of relational memory would enable intact monkeys to make…”
• The temporal context model in spatial navigation and relational learning: toward a common explanation of medial temporal lobe function across domains. (2005, background): “An intermediate stimulus representation like that described here could be used to construct an associative gradient to perform the transitive inference task, in much the same way that the Frank et al. (2003) model did.”
• When logic fails: Implicit transitive inference in humans (2005, background): “In other words, this anchoring effect causes approach-and-avoid associations to “bleed” over to adjacent stimuli B and E (for more explicit analyses of these and related ideas, see Frank et al., 2003; Levy & Wu, 1997; Siemann & Delius, 1998; cf. von Fersen et al., 1991).”