On the Analysis and Interpretation of Inhomogeneous Quadratic Forms as Receptive Fields
By Pietro Berkes, Laurenz Wiskott. 2006
55 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Model Architectures, Signal Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Wojciech Samek
- K. Müller
- Grgoire Montavon
- Dacheng Tao
- Andreas Holzinger
- Yoshua Bengio
- Sebastian Lapuschkin
- Andrea Vedaldi
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Dacheng Tao
- Zhang Zhang
- Pietro Berkes
- Laurenz Wiskott
- Grgoire Montavon
- Matthew D. Zeiler
- Wojciech Samek
- Rob Fergus
In Model Architectures
- Grgoire Montavon
- Matthew D. Zeiler
- Dacheng Tao
- Rob Fergus
- Zhang Zhang
- K. Müller
- Wojciech Samek
- Andreas Holzinger
In Signal Processing
- Grgoire Montavon
- Matthew D. Zeiler
- Laurenz Wiskott
- Pietro Berkes
- Dacheng Tao
- Rob Fergus
- Zhang Zhang
- Wojciech Samek
Citations in the corpus
- Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networks (2013, methodology): “Motivated by the latter’s short-coming, (Le et al., 2010) (extending an idea by (Berkes & Wiskott, 2006)) show how the Hessian of a given unit may be computed numerically around the optimal response, giving some insight into invariances.”
- What do we need to build explainable AI systems for the medical domain? (2017, methodology): “Activation maximization can be used as an analysis framework that searches for an input pattern to produce a maximum model response for a specific quantity of interest (Berkes and Wiskott, 2006; Simonyan and Zisserman, 2014).”
- Methods for interpreting and understanding deep neural networks (2017, background): “Activation maximization is an analysis framework that searches for an input pattern that produces a maximum model response for a quantity of interest [9, 17, 44].”
- Understanding Deep Features with Computer-Generated Imagery (2015, background): “In addition to the prior work to visualize learned CNN filters [5, 11, 12, 32, 41, 42], there has been work to visualize hand-designed [37] and deep [25] features.”
- Causability and explainability of artificial intelligence in medicine (2019, background): “Activation maximization (Montavon et al., 2017) identifies input patterns that lead to maximal activations relating to specific classes in the output layer (Berkes & Wiskott, 2006; Simonyan & Zisserman, 2014).”
- Hierarchical Convolutional Deep Learning in Computer Vision (2013, background): “[71] (extending an idea by Berkes and Wiskott [9]) show how the Hessian of a given unit may be computed numerically around the optimal response, giving some insight into invariances.”
- VisualBackProp: efficient visualization of CNNs (2018, unknown): “This method extends previous approaches [26].”
- VisualBackProp: visualizing CNNs for autonomous driving (2016, methodology): “This method extends previous approaches (Berkes & Wiskott, 2006).”
- Slow Feature Analysis for Human Action Recognition (2012, methodology): “11 shows the optimal excitatory stimulus and the optimal inhibitory stimulus of the first six slow feature functions by using the method in [46].”
- Slow feature analysis yields a rich repertoire of complex cell properties. (2005, methodology): “However, typically only a few subunits (those corresponding to the largest eigenvalues) are structured like simple cells (see also Berkes & Wiskott, 2005 ).”