Reinforcement Learning Using Neural Networks, with Applications to Motor Control
By Rémi Coulom. 2002
115 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Reinforcement Learning
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Reinforcement Learning
- Sergey Levine
- Pieter Abbeel
- Chelsea Finn
- Nicolas Manfred Otto Heess
- Shixiang Shane Gu
- Timothy P. Lillicrap
- Ofir Nachum
- Shimon Whiteson
Citations in the corpus
- Benchmarking Deep Reinforcement Learning for Continuous Control (2016, methodology): “We implement five basic tasks that have been widely analyzed in reinforcement learning and control literature: Cart-Pole Balancing (Stephenson, 1908; Donaldson, 1960; Widrow, 1964; Michie & Chambers, 1968), Cart-Pole Swing Up (Kimura & Kobayashi, 1999; Doya, 2000), Mountain Car (Moore, 1990),…”
- Learning Continuous Control Policies by Stochastic Value Gradients (2015, background): “Swimmer is a chain body with multiple links immersed in a fluid environment with drag forces that allow the body to propel itself [5, 27].”
- DeepMind Control Suite (2018, methodology): “This procedurally generated k -link planar swimmer is based on (Coulom, 2002) but using MuJoCo’s high-Reynolds fluid drag model.”
- Gaussian Processes for Data-Efficient Learning in Robotics and Control (2015, neutral): “, without human demonstrations or known dynamics models [11], [18], [27], [45], [56].”
- Reinforcement Learning by Value Gradients (2008, methodology): “This is described by (White and Sofge, 1992, ch. 10) and (Coulom, 2002, Appendix A).”
- Autonomous blimp control using model-free reinforcement learning in a continuous state and action space (2007, methodology): “Therefore, function approximation techniques that directly operate on the continuous space such as neural networks [1], [15], kernel methods [9], or Gaussian processes [13], [3] have been proposed as powerful alternatives to the discrete approximations of the continuous Q-function.”
- Thinking While Moving: Deep Reinforcement Learning with Concurrent Control (2020, background): “Finite differences can approximate the Bellman update in continuous-time stochastic control problems (Munos & Bourgine, 1998) and continuous-time temporal difference learning methods (Doya, 2000) can utilize neural networks as function approximators (Coulom, 2002).”
- Harms from Increasingly Agentic Algorithmic Systems (2023, background): “Prior to 2013, RL systems were developed mainly for a restricted set of simple domains [Coulom 2002].”
- PILCO: A Model-Based and Data-Efficient Approach to Policy Search (2011, methodology): “5 shows the interaction time with the cart-pole system required by pilco and algorithms in the literature that solved this task from scratch (Kimura & Kobayashi, 1999), (Doya, 2000), (Coulom, 2002), (Wawrzynski & Pacut, 2004), (Riedmiller, 2005), (Raiko & Tornio, 2009), (van Hasselt, 2010).”
- Receding Horizon Differential Dynamic Programming (2007, methodology): “In this section we describe our model of the d-link swimmer dynamical system, first presented by Coulom [3].”
- Value-gradient learning (2012, background): “4 of Coulom (2002). These also have asymptotic timings of O(dim(~ w) dim(~x)).”
- A Practical and Conceptual Framework for Learning in Control (2010, background): “Classical references for kriging are the books by Matheron (1973), Cressie (1993), and Stein (1999). O’Hagan (1978) first describes GPs as a non-parametric prior over functions. Neal (1996, Chapter 2.1) shows that a neural network converges to a GP if the number of hidden units tends to infinity and”
- Neural Reinforcement Learning Controllers for a Real Robot Application (2007, unknown): “In contrast to other work that applies RL to real world systems, we do not make use of a model or simulator to train our controllers (like e.g. in [1]).”
- dm_control: Software and Tasks for Continuous Control (2020, background): “The physical model conforms to (Coulom, 2002) rather than the earlier Spong 1995.”