Inequality of opportunity in the land of opportunities, 1968–2001

By Nicolas Pistolesi. 2009

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5f76d3a9daa44b36feb122bd714a4d6ca450cc4b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. John E. Roemer
2. Dirk Van de gaer
3. Alain Trannoy
4. Xavier Ramos
5. Florencia Torche
6. Gaston Yalonetzky

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Alain Trannoy
2. John E. Roemer
3. Dirk Van de gaer
4. Xavier Ramos
5. Florencia Torche
6. Marc Fleurbaey
7. Gustavo A. Marrero
8. Gaston Yalonetzky

Citations in the corpus

• Empirical Approaches to Inequality of Opportunity: Principles, Measures, and Evidence (2012, methodology): “As compared to Roemer’s nonparametric methodology, the methodology in this subsection relies on functional form assumptions to obtain inequality of opportunity estimates (but see Pistolesi (2009), discussed in section 5.”
• Equality of Opportunity: Theory and Measurement (2016, methodology): “Pistolesi (2009) then predicts two counterfactual distributions for both educational and working-duration distributions.”