Draft ITU-T recommendation and final draft international standard of joint video specification

1,615 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Understanding sources of inefficiency in general-purpose chips (2010, methodology): “Five major functions comprise more than 99% of the total execution time in our base CMP implementation: We implement the H.264 baseline profile at level 3.1; however, we use CABAC in place of CAVLC because CABAC is more complex and more challenging to improve [23][24].”
The H.264/AVC Advanced Video Coding standard: overview and introduction to the fidelity range extensions (2004, methodology): “264/AVC) [6] is the newest entry in the series of international video coding standards.”
Analysis, fast algorithm, and VLSI architecture design for H.264/AVC intra frame coder (2005, methodology): “The work of Y.-W. Huang was supported by SiS Education Foundation Scholarship Program.”
Rate-distortion analysis for H.264/AVC video coding and its application to rate control (2005, background): “In [15], the basic operation unit in the HRD buffer is an access unit.”
Exploring Video Quality Assessment on User Generated Contents from Aesthetic and Technical Perspectives (2022, background): “, blurs, artifacts) and their impact on quality, so as to compare and guide technical systems such as cameras [14, 15], restoration algorithms [16–18] and compression standards [19].”