Elasticities of Demand and Willingness to Pay for Environmental Services in Sweden
By Stina Hökby, T. Söderqvist. 2003
203 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Marketing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5f331c001ae677518850705b1af868f6c4a368f1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- N. Hanley
- Paulina Oliva
- A. Bergmann
- Robert E. Wright
- Jette Bredahl Jacobsen
- B. Tranter
- Reed Walker
- Solomon Hsiang
In Marketing
Citations in the corpus
- Political divisions over climate change and environmental issues in Australia (2011, background): “Several previous studies have shown WTP for environmental quality and services varies according to household income (Witzke and Urfei 2001, Hokby and Soderqvist 2003, Israel 2004), although Stumborg et al. (2001) found positive although only weak correlations for income, and Israel and Levinson (200”
- The Distribution of Environmental Damages (2019, background): “This literature consistently reports that the income elasticity for ecosystem services provided by forests and wetlands is less than one (Kristrom and Riera 1996; Ho¨kby and So¨derqvist 2003).”
- Willingness-to-pay and policy-instrument choice for climate-change policy in the United States (2013, unknown): “These results are consistent with the finding of other studies that find positive income elasticities of WTP for environmental goods in the United States and other nations (e.g., Kristrom and Riera, 1996; Hökby and Söderqvist, 2003).”
- Valuing the attributes of renewable energy investments (2006, background): “Another reason why attitudes towards renewable energy investments might vary across people is their income: either because environmental concern is a “luxury” (Hokby and Soderqvist, 2003), or because rising energy prices hit poorer households disproportionately hard.”
- Are There Income Effects on Global Willingness to Pay for Biodiversity Conservation? (2009, background): “A more suitable measure of income responsiveness is the income elasticity of WTP, ε w , which can be defined as: where y is income and W is a " bid function " for WTP (Flores and Carson 1997; Hökby and Söderqvist 2003).”