Alternative life-history patterns of estuarine fish: barium in otoliths elucidates freshwater residency

219 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Otolith chemistry to determine movements of diadromous and freshwater fish (2005, unknown): “The amount of time that fish spent in fresh water ranged between 0% (Port Adelaide, SA) and 95% (Ewens Ponds, SA) with individual fish moving between freshwater and marine waters up to 6 times (Elsdon and Gillanders 2005).”
Quantifying the contribution of juvenile migratory phenotypes in a population of Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (2010, background): “…of smolt-sized 228 Miller et al.: Migratory phenotypes in Chinook salmon 229 Mar Ecol Prog Ser 408: 227–240, 2010 crimination between estuarine and marine habitats because Ba:Ca is often much greater (>50×) in freshwater compared with marine waters (Elsdon & Gillanders 2005, Hamer et al. 2006).”
Approaches to resolving cephalopod movement and migration patterns (2007, methodology): “…analyses of the naturally occurring elemental and/or isotopic signatures of fish otoliths are widely used and have been a useful tool for reconstructing a fish’s life history, including elucidating migration pathways (e.g., Tsukamoto et al. 1998; Campana 1999; Elsdon and Gillanders 2005, 2006).”