The Right Not to Be Subject to Automated Decisions Based on Profiling

By Isak Mendoza, L. Bygrave. 2017

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems (2019, background): “…desire for contestability might be satisfied by a combination of creating interpretable models and instituting a formal process by which a defense attorney has the chance to contest the results with the judge, based on data errors and/or the individualized situation of their client [54, 61, 69].”
The hidden assumptions behind counterfactual explanations and principal reasons (2019, background): “Knowing that one’s application for credit has been rejected due to characteristics outside one’s control might be paramount if the goal is to ensure procedural justice or to reveal when to contest the decision [28, 47, 4].”
Enslaving the Algorithm: From a “Right to an Explanation” to a “Right to Better Decisions”? (2018, background): “Mendoza and Bygrave argue that advertising decisions can never be significant [6] which does not seem unreasonable.”