Multimodal travel groups and attitudes: A latent class cluster analysis of Dutch travelers

267 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

How does environmental concern influence mode choice habits? A mediation analysis (2018, background): “In their literature review on the definition and measurement of multimodality, Molin et al. (2016) emphasize the advantage of choosing a wide time window (a year) to capture the multimodal dimension of mobility.”
From attitude to satisfaction: introducing the travel mode choice cycle (2021, unknown): “…choice of a typical or most recent trip for a certain purpose; or modal splits (i.e. observed fractions of trips per travel mode) (see, e.g. Bamberg et al., 2003a; De Vos, Ettema, & Witlox, 2018; Handy et al., 2005; Kitamura et al., 1997; Kroesen et al., 2017; Molin, Mokhtarian, & Kroesen, 2016).”
Do people travel with their preferred travel mode? Analysing the extent of travel mode dissonance and its effect on travel satisfaction (2018, methodology): “Besides rather strong effects from mode-specific attitudes on the frequency of using that mode (e.g., Beirão and Cabral, 2007; Heinen et al., 2011; Kroesen et al., 2017; Molin et al., 2016), also other types of travel-related attitudes can affect travel behaviour.”
Interrelationships between influential factors and behavioral intention with regard to autonomous vehicles (2018, background): “For example, Molin, Mokhtarian, and Kroesen (2016) identified a latent class within multimodal travelers by using latent class cluster analysis.”