Queen reproduction, chemical signalling and worker behaviour in polygyne colonies of the ant Formica fusca
By Minttumaaria Hannonen, M. Sledge, S. Turillazzi, L. Sundström. 2002
96 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5ecde6cf7ed0c189abec0744718fb067e847f824
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Genetics
In Insect Science
Citations in the corpus
- Queen fertility, egg marking and colony size in the ant Camponotus floridanus (2006, unknown): “…link between CHC patterns and fertility (Bonavita-Cougourdan et al. 1991; Ayasse et al. 1995; Monnin et al. 1998; Peeters et al. 1999; Liebig et al. 2000; Sledge et al. 2001; Cuvillier-Hot et al. 2002, 2004a; Hannonen et al. 2002; Heinze et al. 2002; Tentschert et al. 2002; De Biseau et al. 2004).”
- Chemical recognition of reproductive status in social insects (2006, methodology): “Using experimental Formica fusca (Formicinae) colonies with two queens, Hannonen et al. (2002) showed that queens differing in reproductive output also differ in CHC profiles and in the degree of attention they get from workers.”
- Fertility signalling and reproductive skew in queenless ants (2004, background): “Unlike previous explanations based on the inhibition of ovarian activity, honest signals would benefit all the parties (Keller & Nonacs 1993), in line with biological signalling theory ( Grafen 1990 ).”