Chain Galaxies in the Tadpole Advanced Camera for Surveys Field

By D. Elmegreen, Bruce G. Elmegreen, Clara M. Sheets. 2004

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Colors and magnitudes were determined for 69 chain galaxies, 58 other linear structures, 32 normal edge-on galaxies, and all of their large star formation clumps in the Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys field of the Tadpole galaxy. Redshifts of 0.5-2 are inferred from comparisons with published color-evolution models. The linear galaxies have no red nuclear bulges like the normal disk galaxies in our field, but the star formation clumps in each have about the same colors and magnitudes. Light profiles along the linear galaxies tend to be flat, unlike the exponential profiles of normal galaxies. Although the most extreme of the linear objects look like beaded filaments, they are all probably edge-on disks that will evolve to late Hubble type galaxies. The lack of an exponential profile is the result of either a dust scale height that is comparable to the stellar scale height or an intrinsically irregular structure. Examples of galaxies that could be face-on versions of linear galaxies are shown. They have an irregular clumpy structure with no central bulge and with clump colors and magnitudes that are comparable to those in the linear galaxies. Radiative transfer solutions to the magnitudes and surface brightnesses of inclined dusty galaxies suggest that edge-on disks should become more prominent near the detection limit for surface brightness. The surface brightness distribution of the edge-on galaxies in this field confirm this selection effect. The star formation regions are much more massive than in modern galaxies, averaging up to ~109 M☉ for kiloparsec scales.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5ec49c0eba305d98ab85fa32fc6bb3fe0dd5cdc7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. A. Dekel
  3. L. Hernquist
  4. P. V. van Dokkum
  5. R. Dav'e
  6. R. Somerville
  7. M. Franx
  8. D. M. Alexander

In Instrumentation

  1. A. Dekel
  2. P. V. van Dokkum
  3. P. Hopkins
  4. M. Franx
  5. R. Dav'e
  6. L. Hernquist
  7. R. Somerville
  8. Christopher J. Conselice

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. M. Franx
  2. P. V. van Dokkum
  3. A. Dekel
  4. K. Whitaker
  5. F. Walter
  6. A. Koekemoer
  7. S. Wuyts
  8. R. Bouwens

Citations in the corpus