Dual geometries for a set of 3-charge microstates

By S. Giusto, Samir D. Mathur, A. Saxena. 2004

270 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract We construct a set of extremal D1–D5–P solutions, by taking appropriate limits in a known family of nonextremal 3-charge solutions. The extremal geometries turn out to be completely smooth, with no horizon and no singularity. The solutions have the right charges to be the duals of a family of CFT microstates which are obtained by spectral flow from the NS vacuum.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e9aa7084a67619f4504fb65ddbd70ac00b19d9b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

Citations in the corpus

Bubbling supertubes and foaming black holes (2005, background): “In this limit, our solutions reduce to the bound state solutions constructed by Mathur and collaborators [5,6,7] by taking novel extremal limits of the non-extremal rotating three-charge black hole [34].”
Black holes as effective geometries (2008, background): “The first success was achieved in [14] which was followed by other works [106, 107, 111].”
Black holes, black rings and their microstates (2007, background): “Many groups have worked at obtaining smooth microstate solutions corresponding to five-dimensional and four-dimensional black holes, a few of the relevant references include [22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36].”
One Ring to Rule Them All ... and in the Darkness Bind Them (2004, methodology): “A few steps towards extending the “one geometry per microstate” picture to the three charge case have been made by analyzing these configurations via the Born-Infeld action of the component branes [4], by perturbing or doing spectral flow on two charge solutions [3, 5, 6], or by constructing familie”
The fuzzball proposal for black holes (2008, background): “In particular, one can generate certain 3-charge D1-D5-P geometries from 2-charge D1-D5 geometries in this way [86, 87, 68, 89].”
Habemus superstratum! A constructive proof of the existence of superstrata (2015, methodology): “The solution generating technique that was used in the literature [8, 10, 14, 15] to obtain smooth three-charge solutions starting from two-center geometries constructs solutions that are”
Mergers and typical black hole microstates (2006, methodology): “This is essentially what happens in the microstate solutions constructed and analyzed by [13,14,15,16].”
Nonsupersymmetric smooth geometries and D1-D5-P bound states (2005, unknown): “pic degeneracy √ n1n5np, and were used in [2] in the calculation of the black hole entropy. Recently, Giusto, Mathur, and Saxena have identiﬁed smooth geometries corresponding to some of these states [22, 23], although the geometries constructed so far correspond to very special states, the spectral”
Supergravity microstates for BPS black holes and black rings (2005, background): “Figure 1: Basic 2-pole example has a spherical domain wall Now that we have worked out a general formalism, let us illustrate it with the simplest example, the two pole solution; this reproduces the solutions of [11, 12, 13].”
Black hole bound states in AdS(3) x S**2 (2008, background): “the (4,4) D1-D5 CFT, these geometries were further studied in detail in [47, 48].”