The effect of the second order GPS ionospheric correction on receiver positions

By S. Kedar, George Hajj, B. Wilson, M. Heflin. 2003

259 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e880e785792c5fb878934bd162e7f5c06872053

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aerospace Engineering

1. Alireza Amiri-Simkooei
2. Jaume Sanz
3. M. Hernández‐Pajares
4. Simon D. P. Williams
5. José Miguel Juan
6. Linette Prawirodirdjo
7. Yehuda Bock
8. Xavier Collilieux

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. Jaume Sanz
2. M. Hernández‐Pajares
3. Simon D. P. Williams
4. José Miguel Juan

Citations in the corpus

• Error analysis of continuous GPS position time series (2004, methodology): “[23] Langbein and Johnson [1997] and Mao et al. [1999] demonstrated with synthetic data that the MLE technique could recover accurate and precise estimates of the noise magnitudes and their uncertainties. They also tested power spectral analysis of the time series for estimating the spectral index. ”
• Spatiotemporal filtering using principal component analysis and Karhunen-Loeve expansion approaches for regional GPS network analysis (2006, result): “However, previous studies [e.g., Dong et al., 2002; Kedar et al., 2003] have shown that some of the seasonal effects are due to systematic errors in the daily GPS solution time series.”
• Second-order ionospheric term in GPS : Implementation and impact on geodetic estimates (2007, methodology): “In this way they overcome the limitations of the PPP positioning strategy used by Kedar et al. [2003] as we do in this work.”