Associative hierarchical CRFs for object class image segmentation
By Lubor Ladicky, Chris Russell, Pushmeet Kohli, Philip H. S. Torr. 2009
704 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Luc Van Gool
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Jitendra Malik
- Dacheng Tao
- Alan L. Yuille
- Xiaogang Wang
- Trevor Darrell
- Andrew Zisserman
Citations in the corpus
- DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFs (2016, background): “Even thoughworks of increased sophistication have been proposed to model the hierarchical dependency [26], [27], [28] and/or high-order dependencies”
- Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets and Fully Connected CRFs (2014, background): “Even though works of increased sophistication have been proposed to model the hierarchical dependency (He et al., 2004; Ladicky et al., 2009; Lempitsky et al., 2011) and/or high-order dependencies of segments (Delong et al.”
- Multi-Scale Context Aggregation by Dilated Convolutions (2015, background): “Our work shows that the dilated convolution operator is particularly suited to dense prediction due to its ability to expand the receptive field without losing resolution or coverage.”
- Conditional Random Fields as Recurrent Neural Networks (2015, background): “Lack of such smoothness constraints can result in poor object delineation and small spurious regions in the segmentation output [31, 30, 14, 21].”
- Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentation (2018, methodology): “There are several model variants proposed to exploit the contextual information for segmentation [28, 65, 36, 39, 22, 79, 51, 14], including those that employ multi-scale inputs (i.”
- Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentation (2017, background): “It has been shown that global features or contextual interactions [28, 65, 36, 40, 22, 77] are beneficial in correctly classifying pixels for semantic segmentation.”
- Efficient Inference in Fully Connected CRFs with Gaussian Edge Potentials (2011, methodology): “[13] by adding color, histogram of oriented gradients (HOG), and pixel location features.”
- Feedforward semantic segmentation with zoom-out features (2014, neutral): “Finally, despite the surprising success of the zoom-out architecture described here, we by no means intend to entirely dismiss CRFs, or more generally inference in structured models.”
- Auto-DeepLab: Hierarchical Neural Architecture Search for Semantic Image Segmentation (2019, background): “It has been known that context information is crucial for pixel labeling tasks [26, 69, 37, 39, 16, 54, 14, 10].”
- Searching for Efficient Multi-Scale Architectures for Dense Image Prediction (2018, background): “A critical element of building such systems is supplying global features and context information to perform pixel-level classification [35, 78, 41, 45, 31, 92, 60, 19, 63].”
- Higher Order Conditional Random Fields in Deep Neural Networks (2015, methodology): “Conditional Random Fields (CRFs) have been the most common framework, and various rich and expressive models [27,29,48], based on higher order clique potentials, have been developed to improve segmentation performance.”
- DeeperLab: Single-Shot Image Parser (2019, background): “For example, it has been known that contextual information is essential for pixel labeling [23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29].”
- Discrete optimization of ray potentials for semantic 3D reconstruction (2015, methodology): “Implementation Details As an input our method uses semantic likelihoods, predicted by a pixel-wise context-based classifier from [15], and depth likelihoods obtained by a plane sweep stereo matching algorithm using zero-mean normalized crosscorrelation.”
- Nonparametric semantic segmentation for 3D street scenes (2013, background): “Considerable effort has been focussed towards geometrically modelling the environment with a map consisting of sparse or dense point cloud for accurate localisation [1]–[4].”
- ImageNet Auto-Annotation with Segmentation Propagation (2014, methodology): “A simple and widely used technique is to group pixels into superpixels [67,39], and assume that all the pixels inside a superpixel share the same label.”
- Diverse M-Best Solutions in Markov Random Fields (2012, methodology): “In a sequence of papers [15, 16], the authors developed a MAP inference algorithm for this model, and we are directly able to utilize this algorithm to compute DivMBest solutions, by rerunning it with modified node energies.”
- Semantic Segmentation based on Stacked Discriminative Autoencoders and Context-Constrained Weakly Supervised Learning (2015, methodology): “Table 1 reports the average accuracy over all 21 object classes in comparison with state-of-the-art semantic segmentation methods, including both fully supervised (FS) [10, 11] and weakly supervised (WS) [4, 5].”
- Joint Semantic Segmentation and 3D Reconstruction from Monocular Video (2014, methodology): “[20] consisting of color, histogram of oriented gradients (HOG), pixel location features and several filter banks.”
- Data-driven fluid simulations using regression forests (2015, methodology): “Various forms of integral features have been previously used for example in the face detector of [Viola and Jones 2004] to calculate Haar wavelets, or in 2D semantic pixelwise classifiers [Shotton et al. 2006; Ladicky et al. 2009] for the fast bag-of-words representation calculation.”