Principles for valid histopathologic scoring in research
By K. Gibson-Corley, A. Olivier, D. Meyerholz. Veterinary Pathology-Supplement, 2013
844 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Histopathologic scoring is a tool by which semiquantitative data can be obtained from tissues. Initially, a thorough understanding of the experimental design, study objectives, and methods is required for the pathologist to appropriately examine tissues and develop lesion scoring approaches. Many principles go into the development of a scoring system such as tissue examination, lesion identification, scoring definitions, and consistency in interpretation. Masking (aka “blinding”) of the pathologist to experimental groups is often necessary to constrain bias, and multiple mechanisms are available. Development of a tissue scoring system requires appreciation of the attributes and limitations of the data (eg, nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio data) to be evaluated. Incidence, ordinal, and rank methods of tissue scoring are demonstrated along with key principles for statistical analyses and reporting. Validation of a scoring system occurs through 2 principal measures: (1) validation of repeatability and (2) validation of tissue pathobiology. Understanding key principles of tissue scoring can help in the development and/or optimization of scoring systems so as to consistently yield meaningful and valid scoring data.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology, Physiology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e6ed441d78accb469fac82546cf4876073f767a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Molecular Biology
Citations in the corpus
- Different approaches for interpretation and reporting of immunohistochemistry analysis results in the bone tissue – a review (2014, background): “also described some key principles for an appropriate scoring system and data evaluation [33]:”