Trust in recommender systems
By John O'Donovan, Barry Smyth. International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 2005
978 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e622aca9c687598dc2e1f00de19a887ecf706db
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
In Information Systems
- Charu C. Aggarwal
- Yong Liu
- Xiwang Yang
- Harald Steck
- Michael R. Lyu
- Irwin King
- Martin Ester
- Mohsen Jamali
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Yong Liu
- Xiwang Yang
- Martin Ester
- Harald Steck
- Mohsen Jamali
- Jingjing Zhang
- Fernando Ortega
- Antonio Hernando
Citations in the corpus
- TrustWalker: a random walk model for combining trust-based and item-based recommendation (2009, methodology): “Trust has been deflned and used in a difierent way by [ 12 ].”
- Recommender Systems (2016, neutral): “The work in [187] showed how to infer trust relationships directly from ratings data [187], although there is some debate on whether this notion of trust is generally accepted as it is conventionally used in the literature.”
- Personalized Recommendation Combining User Interest and Social Circle (2014, neutral): “Many social network based models [3], [13]–[19], [33]– [37] have been proposed to improve the performance of the RS. Recently, Yang et al. [1] propose to use the concept of 'inferred trust circle' based on the domain-obvious circles of friends on social networks to recommend user favorite items.”
- A survey of trust in computer science and the Semantic Web (2007, background): “…[39] (Yu and Singh, 2002) [40] (Yu and Singh, 2003) [41] (Sabater and Sierra, 2002) [42] (Beth et al., 1994) [43] (Xiao and Benbasat, 2003) [44] (O'Donovan and Smyth, 2005) [45] Trust metrics in a web of trust (Goldbeck and Hendler, 2004a) [51] (Goldbeck and Hendler, 2004b) [52] (Stewart, 1999)…”
- Why I like it: multi-task learning for recommendation and explanation (2018, background): “In order to build trust between a recommender system and its users, it has become important to complement recommendations with explanations so that users can understand why a particular item has been suggested [36, 49].”
- Recommendation systems: Principles, methods and evaluation (2015, background): “Following the studies, it can be deduced that computational trust models can act as appropriate means to supplement or completely replace current collaborative filtering technique [73].”
- Circle-based recommendation in online social networks (2012, background): “Several social-trust based RSes have recently been proposed to improve recommendation accuracy, to just name a few, [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [15], [17], [18], and [19].”
- A review of ontology based query expansion (2007, background): “Another interesting dimension in Recommender Systems is that of trust (O'Donovan & Smyth, 2005).”
- Recommender systems survey (2013, background): “Trust and reputation is an important area of research in RS [166]; this area is closely related to the social information currently included in RS [114].”
- Trust building with explanation interfaces (2006, background): “They also showed that providing explanations can improve the acceptance of ACF systems and potentially improve users filtering performance.”
- Recommender system application developments: A survey (2015, background): “O'Donovan [61] claimed that user similarity may be overemphasized.”
- Recommender systems with social regularization (2011, methodology): “In recent work proposed in [23], Ma et al. developed a factor analysis method based on the probabilistic graphical model, which fuses the user-item matrix with the users’ social trust networks by sharing a common latent low-dimensional user feature matrix.”