A note on the overlap region in turbulent boundary layers

By J. M. Österlund, Arne V. Johansson, H. Nagib, M. Hites. 2000

367 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e5d74e4dbe4332e29f549ba8ec48e0062e2c634

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Mechanics

In Environmental Engineering

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

A new friction factor relationship for fully developed pipe flow (2005, methodology): “(2005), vol. 538, pp. 429–443. c© 2005 Cambridge University Press doi:10.1017/S0022112005005501 Printed in the United Kingdom 429”
Rough-wall boundary layers: mean flow universality (2007, neutral): “Cf Mesh Blocks Sanspray Cubes FSS FMF Bergstrom et al. (2005) Flack et al. (2007) Rotta/Tani Π = 0.55 Rotta/Tani Π = 0.7 Coles 1962 Osterlund et al. (2000)”
Simulations of Spatially Evolving Turbulent Boundary Layers up to Reθ = 4300 (2010, methodology): “However, as pointed out by Österlund et al. (2000), a clear overlap region can only be detected above Reθ ≈ 6000, which might be just about to become accessible for adequately resolved transient numerical simulations.”
Turbulent boundary layer statistics at very high Reynolds number (2015, background): “The values of κ reported in the past have varied over a considerable range, with values as low as 0.38 in a boundary layer (Österlund et al. 2000) and as high as 0.42 in a pipe (McKeon et al. 2004).”
Further observations on the mean velocity distribution in fully developed pipe flow (2004, methodology): “ Osterlund et al. (2000) (κ =0 .38 and B =4 .1) and Zanoun et al. (2002) (κ =0 .379 and B =4 .05) fit our pipe flow measurements quite well, but only for the small region where 350 <y + < 950, compared with their range of 200/δ+ <y /δ <0.15.”
Developments In Smooth Wall Turbulent Duct Flows (2005, neutral): “This integration is not straightforward and the reader is encouraged to consult Perry et al. (1986), Li (1989) or Marusic (1991) for more details on this.”
High–Reynolds Number Wall Turbulence (2011, background): “…fully developed channel flows (Liu et al. 2001; Zanoun et al. 2003, 2009; Monty et al. 2007) and turbulent boundary layers (George & Castillo 1997, Österlund et al. 2000, Castillo & Johansson 2002, Chauhan & Nagib 2006, Nagib & Chauhan 2008, Nickels et al. 2007) were completed, over a reasonably…”
Turbulent boundary layers at moderate Reynolds numbers: inflow length and tripping effects (2012, methodology): “The log-law indicator function Ξ = y+ dU+/dy+, which is commonly employed to measure the von Kármán constant, κ , in the overlap region (Österlund et al. 2000), since it asymptotes to κ−1 in a logarithmic region, is presented in figure 8.”
Scaling of the energy spectra of turbulent channels (2003, result): “…clear that, while the logarithmic law for the mean velocity profile may be a good approximation to the experimental data (Zagarola & Smits 1997; Österlund et al. 2000), there are serious similarity failures in the behaviour of the velocity fluctuations, including the scaling of their…”
The rough-wall turbulent boundary layer from the hydraulically smooth to the fully rough regime (2006, background): “…also be noted that values of Uτ for the smooth walls agree, within experimental uncertainty, with both the Reθ -based correlation of Fernholz & Finley (1996), and the correlation of Österlund et al. (2000) which is based on direct measurement of the skin friction using oil-film interferometry.”