First-Order Adversarial Vulnerability of Neural Networks and Input Dimension
By Carl-Johann Simon-Gabriel, Yann Ollivier, L. Eon Bottou, Bernhard Schölkopf, David Lopez-Paz. 2018
110 citations recorded by the source corpus.
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Adversarial Defense Via Local Flatness Regularization (2019, unknown): “Specifically, in [13], the relationship between the average value of the chosen norm of the gradient regarding to input space and the adversarial vulnerability was discussed, based on which the authors proposed a defense method by regularizing that value.”
- Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Large Perturbations (2020, background): “The effect of different initializations on adversarial training has not been studied rigorously in the literature (Ben Daya et al., 2018; Simon-Gabriel et al., 2018).”
- Boosting Adversarial Training with Hypersphere Embedding (2020, background): “Most of the adversarial attacks applied in AT belong to the family of first-order adversaries [65], due to the computational efficiency.”
- A Kernel Perspective for Regularizing Deep Neural Networks (2018, unknown): “Related penalties have been considered in the context of robust optimization, for regularization or robustness, noting that a penalty based on the gradient of the loss function x 7→ l(y, f(x)) can give a good approximation of (7) when ǫ is small (Drucker & Le Cun, 1991; Lyu et al., 2015; Roth et al.”
- Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Training (2020, background): “(1) and instead regularize the model to improve robustness [36, 25, 28], however this does not lead to higher robustness compared to standard adversarial training.”