Elements of Reason: Coping with Trade-Offs: Psychological Constraints and Political Implications

By Philip Tetlock. 2000

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e3dfe6f4ad68938cb00394639c9ea6e2f711f57

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Decision Sciences

1. Bryan D. Jones

In Safety Research

1. Bryan D. Jones

Citations in the corpus

• No Compromise: Political Consequences of Moralized Attitudes (2017, unknown): “…inspiring anger or contempt.2 A distinctive characteristic of moralized attitudes is that, pitted against other attitudes, they resist processing through a cost/benefit framework (Baron and Spranca 1997; Bennis, Medin and Bartels 2010; Fiske and Tetlock 1997; Tetlock 2000; Tetlock et al. 2000).”
• Bounded Rationality and Political Science: Lessons from Public Administration and Public Policy (2003, background): “It became evident very early in the study of human choice that people have a difficult time trading off one goal against another when making a choice (Slovak 1990; Tetlock 2000).”