EQ-5D value sets : inventory, comparative review, and user guide

By A. Szende, M. Oppe, N. Devlin. 2007

627 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study (2012, background): “Over the past twenty years, value sets for the 3L health classification system have been developed for many countries around the world [2].”
EQ-5D and the EuroQol Group: Past, Present and Future (2017, methodology): “Different research teams adapted the MVH study design in various ways, making different choices about, for example, the number and selection of states to value; ‘exclusion rules’ applied to the data; and so on [24].”
Valuing health‐related quality of life: An EQ‐5D‐5L value set for England (2017, methodology): “At the time of writing, 25 value sets for the (three‐level) EQ‐5D‐3L are available (Devlin & Brooks, 2017), a number of which are summarised by Szende, Oppe, and Devlin (2007).”
Differential response rates in postal and web-based surveys in older respondents (2009, methodology): “For each respondent a score was generated on a scale ranging from 1 (perfect health) to 0 (equivalent to death), using Danish dimension weights (Szende et al. 2007).”