A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video).

By Yutaka Saito, T. Uraoka, Yuichiro Yamaguchi, K. Hotta, N. Sakamoto, H. Ikematsu, M. Fukuzawa, N. Kobayashi, J. Nasu, T. Michida and 6 more. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2010

793 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gastroenterology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e23e0b0abbfae70400697d6a59968b4fb6da196

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. P. Pimentel-Nunes
2. P. Bhandari
3. C. Hassan
4. J. Dumonceau
5. M. Rugge
6. M. Dinis-Ribeiro
7. C. Langner
8. H. Messmann

Citations in the corpus

• Endoscopic submucosal dissection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline (2015, positive): “In the largest prospective multi-center study of ESD for colorectal lesions, the number of perforations was 12% in the center with fewer than 50 ESDs performed compared with 4% – 5% at the other centers with greater experience [199].”