The faint radio sky: radio astronomy becomes mainstream
By P. Padovani. The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 2016
148 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Radio astronomy has changed. For years it studied relatively rare sources, which emit mostly non-thermal radiation across the entire electromagnetic spectrum, i.e. radio quasars and radio galaxies. Now, it is reaching such faint flux densities that it detects mainly star-forming galaxies and the more common radio-quiet active galactic nuclei. These sources make up the bulk of the extragalactic sky, which has been studied for decades in the infrared, optical, and X-ray bands. I follow the transformation of radio astronomy by reviewing the main components of the radio sky at the bright and faint ends, the issue of their proper classification, their number counts, luminosity functions, and evolution. The overall “big picture” astrophysical implications of these results, and their relevance for a number of hot topics in extragalactic astronomy, are also discussed. The future prospects of the faint radio sky are very bright, as we will soon be flooded with survey data. This review should be useful to all extragalactic astronomers, irrespective of their favourite electromagnetic band(s), and even stellar astronomers might find it somewhat gratifying.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e177b62ffe1e84844abd87d884c22326bc610fa
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
In Instrumentation
- D. M. Alexander
- R. Hickox
- Mara Salvato
- R. Assef
- Gordon Richards
- E. Hatziminaoglou
- V. Smolčić
- P. Padovani
Citations in the corpus
- Active galactic nuclei: what’s in a name? (2017, methodology): “For other recent reviews of radio-selected AGN we refer to Heckman and Best (2014), Padovani (2016), Tadhunter (2016) and Smolčić (2016).”