Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy:: which is the preferred method?
By Beng Wah Ang. 2004
1,948 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Pollution
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e174114ccbf96fb3c7159099cce162f171f3f42
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Automotive Engineering
In Environmental Engineering
In Pollution
- Peng Zhou
- T. O. Mahony
- Alexander Vaninsky
- Yanrui Wu
- S. Kaneko
- Ming Zhang
- Luciano Charlita de Freitas
- Bin Su
Citations in the corpus
- Factors affecting transport sector CO2 emissions growth in Latin American and Caribbean countries: An LMDI decomposition analysis (2009, neutral): “Nonetheless, the Divisia method is preferred to the refined Laspeyres index method because the relative change shown by the Divisia method is symmetric and additive, unlike that shown by the Laspeyres index method, and the linkages between the multiplicative and additive versions of the Divisa metho”
- Features, trajectories and driving forces for energy-related GHG emissions from Chinese mega cites: The case of Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai and Chongqing (2012, neutral): “, reviewed various index decomposition analysis methods, compared their advantages and disadvantages and recommended the logarithmicmeanDivisa index (LMDI)method,due to its sound theoretical foundation, adaptability, ease of use and ease of result interpretation [36,37], especiallywhen the zero-valu”