Siegel modular forms and representations

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Cohomology of local systems on the moduli of principally polarized abelian surfaces (2013, background): “See [Asgari and Schmidt 2001] for more details.”
On the arithmetic of Shalika models and the critical values of L-functions for GL2n (2011, background): “Πσ−1v ⊗ (Πf ⊗C,σ−1 C) is also cohomological and cuspidal for all σ ∈Aut(C); see Clozel [11].”
The Saito-Kurokawa lifting and functoriality (2005, background): “Therefore Π corresponds to a classical Siegel modular form F of weight k and degree 2 for the full modular group Sp(4,Z) (see [2]).”
On classical Saito-Kurokawa liftings (2007, methodology): “It is these representations which appear as archimedean components of automorphic representations corresponding to holomorphic Siegel modular forms of weight k, see [ AS ].”
Local spectral equidistribution for Siegel modular forms and applications (2010, unknown): “p (1− app)(1− bpp)(1− a−1 p p−s)−1(1− b−1 p p−s)−1 ; it is explained in [2] that this is a Langlands L-function associated with the Spin representation Spin(5,C) → GL(4,C).”
Transfer of Siegel Cusp Forms of Degree 2 (2011, background): “It is well known that every such π gives rise to a holomorphic cuspidal Siegel eigenform of degree 2 and weight l with respect to the full modular group Sp4(Z); see [2].”