Applying the conservativeness principle to REDD to deal with the uncertainties of the estimates

By G. Grassi, S. Monni, S. Federici, Frédéric Achard, D. Mollicone. 2008

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A common paradigm when the reduction of emissions from deforestations is estimated for the purpose of promoting it as a mitigation option in the context of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) is that high uncertainties in input data—i.e., area change and C stock change/area—may seriously undermine the credibility of the estimates and therefore of reduced deforestation as a mitigation option. In this paper, we show how a series of concepts and methodological tools—already existing in UNFCCC decisions and IPCC guidance documents—may greatly help to deal with the uncertainties of the estimates of reduced emissions from deforestation.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e05be83b6b7713c8ba529cfec80fe267ba40597

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Gregory P. Asner
  2. L. Peskett
  3. A. Angelsen

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. Gregory P. Asner
  2. R. F. Hughes
  3. L. Peskett
  4. Joseph Mascaro
  5. A. Angelsen
  6. Sandra A. Brown
  7. Raul Tupayachi
  8. Sven Wunder

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

  1. Joseph Mascaro
  2. Gregory P. Asner
  3. R. F. Hughes
  4. G. Powell
  5. Erle C. Ellis
  6. Jonathan P. Dandois

Citations in the corpus