Failure behavior of an epoxy matrix under different kinds of static loading

By B. Fiedler, M. Hojo, Shojiro Ochiai, K. Schulte, M. Ando. 2001

380 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5dfd5cc755f37f39a7a876d789880d4131ff2c2f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Mechanical Engineering

1. G. Catalanotti
2. A. Arteiro
3. Pedro P. Camanho
4. A. Melro
5. M. Vogler
6. P. Linde
7. S. Pinho
8. A. Long

In Mechanics of Materials

1. G. Catalanotti
2. Pedro P. Camanho
3. A. Arteiro
4. A. Melro
5. M. Vogler
6. P. Linde
7. S. Hallett
8. S. Pinho

Citations in the corpus

• Low velocity impact modeling in composite laminates capturing permanent indentation (2012, neutral): “deformation after testing, particularly under shear stress [16], similar to plasticity deformation.”
• Micromechanical analysis of polymer composites reinforced by unidirectional fibres: Part I – Constitutive modelling (2013, methodology): “The material properties experimentally measured by Fiedler et al. (2001) were used in this validation. Fiedler et al. (2001) determined the stress–strain behaviour of a typical epoxy matrix material under three different loading scenarios: uniaxial tension, uniaxial compression, and pure shear.”
• Mechanical modelling of 3D woven composites considering realistic unit cell geometry (2014, background): “where Pmx and Pcr are the maximum hydrostatic tension in the matrix (crucial for failure of brittle epoxies [27,28]) and its critical value.”
• Micro-mechanical analysis of the in situ effect in polymer composite laminates (2014, background): “[60] characterized the stress-strain behaviour of a typical epoxy matrix material (Toho # 113) under tension, compression and shear.”
• Three-dimensional invariant-based failure criteria for fibre-reinforced composites (2015, background): “For the416 tensile case, the identification of the model parameters was done assuming a417 transverse tensile biaxial strength YBT = 30.3 MPa.418 36 All the examples shown in this section indicate that the failure criteria419 proposed is able to predict first ply failure with a satisfactory degree o”
• Computational micromechanics of the transverse and shear behavior of unidirectional fiber reinforced polymers including environmental effects (2017, neutral): “approach has been adopted by other researchers in the literature [14, 21–23] as it represents a 99 realistic behavior of a polymer [24].”