Evaluation of European diatom trophic indices
By Anna Besse-Lototskaya, P. Verdonschot, M. Coste, B. Van de Vijver. 2011
114 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomaterials, Ecology, Environmental Chemistry
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5def54e7f2b5bdd4fb36e030ebdcb9975fb77889
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomaterials
In Ecology
In Environmental Chemistry
- C. Stenger-Kovács
- Frédéric Rimet
- Agnès Bouchez
- J. Padisák
- K. Tapolczai
- M. Kelly
- L. Naselli-Flores
- R. Barone
Citations in the corpus
- Trait-based ecological classifications for benthic algae: review and perspectives (2016, background): “In addition, the different European indices use different ecological profiles for the same species (probably because their profiles were defined from different ecoregions with limited range of environmental variables); this practice reduces the robustness of the estimations, especially for species p”
- Metabarcoding of lake benthic diatoms: from structure assemblages to ecological assessment (2018, unknown): “(Cemagref, 1997; Besse-Lototskaya et al., 2011; Schmidt-Kloiber & Hering, 2015).”
- Data rich, information poor? Phytobenthos assessment and the Water Framework Directive (2013, methodology): “For diatoms, in particular, there is a leap directly from a list of names to an index, via statistical modelling, with relatively little conceptual underpinning (e.g. Besse-Lotoskaya et al., 2011; Kelly, 2011).”