Explaining Focal Points: Cognitive Hierarchy Theory versus Team Reasoning

By Nicholas Bardsley, Judith Mehta, C. Starmer, Robert Sugden. 2010

222 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5dd33028790261bb3390d09e3f2a8f258adb2fe6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Decision Sciences

1. Miguel A. Costa-Gomes
2. Nagore Iriberri
3. Vincent P. Crawford

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Nagore Iriberri
2. Vincent P. Crawford
3. Miguel A. Costa-Gomes
4. Jonathan F. Donges
5. Tore Ellingsen
6. Joseph Tao-yi Wang
7. Hongbin Cai
8. Kevin Leyton-Brown

In Safety Research

1. Nagore Iriberri
2. Vincent P. Crawford
3. Miguel A. Costa-Gomes
4. Tore Ellingsen
5. Kevin Leyton-Brown
6. James R. Wright
7. Colin F. Camerer
8. Charles D. Sprenger

Citations in the corpus

• Structural Models of Nonequilibrium Strategic Thinking: Theory, Evidence, and Applications (2013, methodology): “Both Crawford, Gneezy, and Rottenstreich (2008) and Bardsley et al. (2010) find some evidence of team reasoning in other treatments, in each case mixed with additional evidence for level-k thinking.”
• Social tipping dynamics for stabilizing Earth’s climate by 2050 (2020, background): “In addition, large-scale public infrastructure investments support the emergence of a shared belief in the emerging new social equilibrium that can help individuals coordinate changes and find new focal points (88).”